In The Death of a Moth , Woolf sits with the uncomfortable experience of seeing death in action. Yet, even as the moths fights to survive, because of the perceived insignificance of the insect, she does little to intervene. All of this is done in silence. As the world around them remains in motion, busy. Woolf remains silently watching the moth. There are no distractions, no judgement – just presence. Not a word is said between the anthropomorphic version of the moth and a quietly observing Woolf. The silence, however, is far from empty. Woolf’s thoughts and silent scrutiny fill the gaps as she reflects the moths struggles with her own, discovering profound realizations about mortality. Woolf’s observation of the moth reminds us that we are not in control. We are one person with many titles that could hold power over multiple things but never everything. Instead of trying to change the things around us to try and make our lives better, Woolf pushes us to understand that the unc...
How can we decide the punishment for a newly created medical procedure? Gene editing, although widely known, is not as sought after as I thought it would be. The most notable case I can think of is of the guy in China who got arrested for editing the genomes of twin babies and even that happened almost seven years ago. From an outside standpoint, what he did probably seemed world- altering (in a good way), I mean, he successfully made it so those twins were resistant to HIV infections and the cells responsible for that could be passed down through further generations. If you think a little harder on it though, you’ll realize you’ve probably never heard of anyone middle aged or old with edited genomes. This is (obviously) because of how new this technology is but (with a little more thought) you’ll get to the fact that we have no idea how this will affect the babies in the future. Could the unaltered version of the altered gene be suppressing something we haven’t studied before?...